小说站
www.xsz.tw台湾小说网
www.192.tw栗子小说 m.lizi.twthinkoflawasan
abstratity,butasaflexiblequantityasitshouldbepersonallyappliedtolonel
huangorjorli.agly,anylapersonalenoughtorespondto
thepersonalityoflonelhuangorjorliisinhunandthereforenolaall.
esejusticeisanart,notasce.
1thisrefers,ofurse,togeneralanhoodasbroughtaboutbythepresentsocial
syste
jespersen,inhishandstructureofenglish,once
referredtothesequalitiesoftheenglishlanguagebypointingtoitsloveof
eno,nsenseandforcefulness.houtontradictsogreatan
authorityojitheenglishlanguage,ibegtodifferonapointhesexes.
nsehepractidarecharacteristicsofenratherthanof
n,oreliabletotaketheirfeetoffthegroundandsoartoiossible
heights.theeselanguageandgraarshoinilybecausethe
language,initsforsyntaxandvocabulary,revealsaresilicityof
thinking,nageryandenoofsyntacticalrelationships.
thissilicityisbestillustratedfroidgihese
bones,ase,youno
e;youe,henoe”shouldnotbensideredasclearasthere
roundabout”youe,ifhees,andhe.e,ifyoue.”in
faoon,indeansenglish,quotes
anenglishsorsetfarrastestifyingbeforethejudge:”hedastidheda
stidhelickedhe,andhelickedhe;ifhelickedheashardashelickedhe,heda
killedhe,andnothehe,”andthisseetoachresensiblealking
thanoneaniccasedistins.ftotheese,the
differeplex,andtheaddingofthethirdpersonsingularending”s”
isassuperfluousasisalreadyprovedtobeitenseihad,hehad;i,he
things”houtever
beingsuoodorlosinganythingexceptaaningless”class”hhas
nothingtodohthebeautyofexpression.ihavegreathopethatenglishand
ariprofessorsablypronouncea”hedont”in
thesandthattheenglishlanguageyonedaybeeassensibleand
clearastheese,throughtheinfluenceofpidgin.
acertainfeninepractistincthasalreadyguidedtheenglishtoabbreviateall
theirsubordinateclausesaschaspossible,like”itting5”god
ed”ifidontnotshallnot
ebaightand”ifnotshallbreakoutweek.”
jespersenalreadyntionssuplicityinenglishas”first
e,firstserved”nocure,nopay,””oen,tandard
pidgin.theyarebeginningtodropthe”,”too”o”.
englishgraaristhereforenotfarfroalvation.theplicityis,
hoountaiy”othe
eseclearlyansthat”ifyouonlysitaanddonothing,evenafortuneas
bigasauntaiibeforetheenglish
catchuphus.
theeseehinkingalsobeillustratedbythenatureofits
abstraetaphoricexpressions.anabstract
notionisoftenexpressedbythebinationoftall”
for”size,””longshort”for”length,””broadnarroh””isthe
bigsllofyourshoes”.”long”and”short”alsoreferthtandwrongof
partiesindispute,astheeseexpressioislongor
short”andthereforeilar
totheenglish”thelongandtheshortofitis....”and”thatnhasnhtwrong”
aningheisagoodnbecausehepreservesagodlikeindiffereowardall
questions,agetinvolvedinprivatedisputes.abstradingslike”ness”
arealsounknoplysay,encius,that”the
eastheeofaejade.”thishasabearing
ontheirlackoianalytiking.
en,sofarasiknos.this,ithink,hasbeenprovedby
ananalyticalstudyofthevocabularyofenauthors.theanalytical,statistical
thouch
ogotothetroubleofuntingoproveit.he
truthdirectlythatensvocabularyinspeedingisdecidedlylessabstract,
thatissuffi.ageryalways
takestheplainology.thehighlyacadetehereisno
differedifferenceofdegreebetdegreesofdifferendnodifference3otbeexactlyreproduese,andaesetranslatorwould
probablysubstituteforitthenquestion:”isthediffereween
runningaystepsandrunningaepsinbattle”sucha
substituteexpressionlosesindefinitioness,butgainsinintelligibility.to
say,”hoentalprocesses”isnotsointelligibleas”how
uldiknoind”,andthisintuisdecidedlyless
affectivethantheese”aatapeinhisbelly”
esethought,therefore,alainsontheperipheryofthevisibleworld,and
thishelpsasenseoffact.this
dislikeofabstractterisfurtherseenintheesenasforclassificationsh
usuallyrequiresharplydefier.iheesealost
expressivenasfordifferentthereare
differentthodsofethodofgafireacrossth
...